Adherents of this philosophy don’t say standard English should be withheld but suggest that standard English and Black English should be presented as different languages, as it were. Related has been the idea that at the grade-school level, Black students whose home dialect is Black English should be taught as bilinguals of a sort. The idea in education circles that standard English functions as an unjust “ gatekeeper,” holding back students of color, has been around for a long time. While not all writing professors would go that far, in terms of appending a critique of capitalist reality to teaching freshman composition, just the notion that standard English is exterior to Black students’ real selves requires a closer look, because it tracks with worrisome currents in the way we are encouraged to think about race, especially lately.įew familiar with today’s academic world will find Inoue’s opinions especially surprising. So you can go out in the world and make Microsoft more money. What they’ve been exposed to is capitalist-inflected about education being the way in which we, you, become a nice little cog in the system and you get skills. And so, for me, my goal as an educator is to change the system. … you can mouth the words that are white, but they’re coming from a body that’s something else, and you may be read that way. You’re always still going to be Black, or you’re always still going to be Latinx, or you’re always still going to be something else. Is it that I have to say, or I have to create a classroom, and a learning experience, that demeans the linguistic history of that student in order for that student to go into the world and go into unfair racist, white supremacist systems and succeed? … Because if that student says, “You’re setting me up for failure,” what they’re saying is, “I want to succeed in that unfair system. The question and the panelists’ answers were quite revealing, including one from Asao Inoue, a rhetoric and composition professor at Arizona State University, who responded that when he hears that kind of objection from a student, he asks himself: Which only reflects how ingrained they are in a system that is inherently racist.” and A., an attendee presented this question: “What do we do when the resistance to code-meshing, for example, in our writing classrooms, comes from our BIPOC students? I ask because, of my attempts to encourage students to use their home dialects in writing, Black students in particular often resist those practices as setting them up for failure. It’s an approach that accomplishes the feat of both underserving Black English speakers and diminishing Blackness.ĭuring the panel’s Q. This school of thought holds that writing instructors should allow - encourage - such freshmen to write either purely in their home dialect or to engage in “code-meshing,” mixing the home dialect and the standard. In March, at the annual Conference on College Composition and Communication, one panel presentation was of particular interest: It concerned requirements in first-year college composition classes and discussed the idea that for students whose home dialect is Black English, or another nonstandard dialect, requiring them to write in standard English is a potentially unjust, if not flatly racist imposition, forcing some students to suppress their true selves in favor of a hegemonic artificiality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |